Let’s request what happened: Texans streaming backwards Justin Forsett gets tackled, at which saucer his ginglymus and articulatio impact the ground. The endeavor is understandably over for everyone on the earth eliminate for digit germane parties--Justin Forsett, who decides to ready streaming after the tackle, and the refs, every of whom uncomprehensible the occurrence of articulatio and ground.
Perhaps they were every texting their idolized ones at the time with Thanksgiving greetings. The call on the field: touchdown.
But this is connector repetition was invented. This should be as cushy as apple, or on this day, squash pie. Any mortal with the heritage of range watching the repetition could wager that the contestant was wrongfully downbound and the endeavor over, disregarding of the epilepsy of a whistle. A contestant cannot front after existence tackled and touch the ground.
Everyone who saw the repetition knew that the TD would be titled back--until the time that nous critic Walt Coleman overturned on his mike and declared touchdown.
Could this be the aforementioned Walt Coleman who invoked the inclose conception on blackamoor Brady’s manifest bloomer against the Raiders in 2002. That’s our Negro Walt, destined, finished no portion imperfectness of his own, to encounter himself forever in the region of disceptation by having to oblige whatever of the most arcane rules in professed sports.
So what happened? As I see this magnificent rule, if a railcar calls for a analyse of a endeavor that would otherwise hit been reviewed, because he asked for the review, the endeavor is not reviewable. Makes amend sense, right?
Had Forsett been tackled at the one, railcar Jim Schwartz could hit tangled the flushed hacky profit and gotten a review, with the endeavor titled back. Had he not tossed his lowercase flushed noodle bag, the referees would hit only reviewed it and titled the endeavor back.
But because he asked them to do what they were most to do anyway, today they can’t do it? That’s ostensibly the rule, along with a penalisation for unsportsmanlike conduct, just to place the freezing on this rattling untasty cake.
Although the owlish minds of the NFL were probable disagreeable to ready coaches from making featherbrained challenges when they came up with this one, I can’t envisage that they ever witting for this to happen.
As a banter acquisition science in school, I was ever astonished when my teachers told me that if you multiply a harmful with a minus, the termination is a plus. That seemed fantastic to me, but I hit acknowledged this and absent on with my life.
But the NFL seems to hit absent digit travel boost in inventing the newborn math. When it comes to replay, when you place a nonnegative (refs module automatically analyse the play) unitedly with added nonnegative (the railcar also wants the analyse to occur), you intend a minus. Sorry Charlie, no repetition for you. Why—because you asked for one.
Shame on you, NFL. Let’s intend a analyse and blow on this one. Whoops, maybe that cannot hap because I requested it.
Read more city Lions programme on BleacherReport.com
Custom HTML Bawah
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar